VIG vs SCHD: ETF Overlap

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares vs Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF — shared top holdings, sector duplication, and what makes each fund different.

Data as of October 20, 2026

Different top holdings

VIG and SCHD share none of their 10 biggest holdings

Shared top holdings

No positions are shared between the two funds' disclosed top holdings — their biggest names are different securities. Sector overlap measures similar industry weights, not the same stocks, so don't read it as duplication.

Only in VIG's top 10: Microsoft 4.9%
Only in VIG's top 10: Apple 4.9%
Only in VIG's top 10: Broadcom 4.3%
Only in SCHD's top 10: Texas Instruments 4.7%
Only in SCHD's top 10: Qualcomm 4.6%
Only in SCHD's top 10: Procter & Gamble 4.2%

Yearly fee on $10,000

VIG: $4 a year, expense ratio 0.04%
SCHD: $6 a year, expense ratio 0.06%

Where they differ

Tech
Financials
Communication
Consumer
Health
Other

Add a third fund

What's different between VIG and SCHD?

The largest VIG positions missing from SCHD's disclosed top holdings are MSFT, AAPL, AVGO. In the other direction, SCHD's largest positions not in VIG's top list are TXN, QCOM, PG. Disclosed lists cover 34.5% of VIG and 41.5% of SCHD; the sector table below compares the funds on complete data.

What does this overlap mean?

Their disclosed top holdings share essentially nothing — typical for funds covering different markets (e.g. US vs ex-US) or different corners of one market. The 67.7% sector overlap reflects a similar sector mix, not duplicated top positions: weighting the same industries is not owning the same stocks. On their biggest positions, treat the pair as complements, not duplicates.

Sector breakdown: VIG vs SCHD

Sector	VIG	SCHD	Overlap
Technology	27.4%	16%	16%
Financial Services	20.7%	9.2%	9.2%
Consumer Staples	9.1%	20.1%	9.1%
Health Care	18.7%	19.3%	18.7%
Energy	3.6%	15.4%	3.6%
Industrials	10.8%	7.3%	7.3%
Consumer Discretionary	3.9%	6.7%	3.9%
Communication Services	0%	5.9%	0%
Materials	3.2%	0%	0%
Utilities	2.7%	0.1%	0.1%
Real Estate	0%	0%	0%

How we calculate it

Holdings overlap sums min(weight in fund A, weight in fund B) across positions that appear in both funds' disclosed top-holdings lists — public data discloses only each fund's largest positions, so this number is a lower bound on true full-portfolio overlap. Sector overlap applies the same min() logic to the funds' complete sector allocations, which cover ~100% of each fund, making it the more complete signal of duplication.

Re-run this comparison live

Fund holdings change over time. Open VIG vs SCHD in the interactive ETF overlap calculator for a fresh comparison — or swap in any other tickers.

Open in the calculator

All comparisons run on the free ETF overlap calculator.

More ETF comparisons

Data & methodology disclaimer

This tool is for education, not investment advice. Holdings and sector data come from public market-data feeds, reflect each fund's most recently disclosed top positions, and can lag the fund's actual portfolio. Overlap computed from disclosed top holdings is a lower bound. Always verify against the fund provider's official holdings file before making decisions.

Track your real portfolio, not just two tickers

Connect your full holding list in the planner: combined look-through exposure, net worth tracking, and your path to financial independence — no spreadsheet required.

Create my account