VIG vs SCHD: ETF Overlap

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares vs Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF — shared top holdings, sector duplication, and what makes each fund different.

Data as of June 12, 2026

Overlap results: VIG vs SCHD

Sector overlap
70.6%

How much of the two funds' sector allocations coincide — computed on full sector data, so this is the headline number.

Top-holdings overlap
0%

Weight the funds' disclosed top holdings have in common. Public data discloses only each fund's largest positions (32.4% of VIG, 43.5% of SCHD), so full-portfolio overlap is at least this much.

Shared top holdings
0

0 positions appear in both funds' disclosed top-holdings lists.

What does this overlap mean?

These funds hold different securities — their disclosed top holdings share essentially nothing (typical for funds covering different markets, e.g. US vs ex-US). The 70.6% sector overlap reflects a similar sector mix, not duplicated positions: weighting the same industries is not owning the same stocks. Treat the pair as complements, not duplicates.

No positions are shared between the two funds' disclosed top holdings — their biggest names are different securities. Sector overlap measures similar industry weights, not the same stocks, so don't read it as duplication.

Top VIG holdings not in SCHD

  • AVGO · Broadcom Inc5.2%
  • AAPL · Apple Inc4.1%
  • MSFT · Microsoft Corp3.9%
  • JPM · JPMorgan Chase & Co3.6%
  • LLY · Eli Lilly and Co3.3%

Top SCHD holdings not in VIG

  • QCOM · Qualcomm Inc6.7%
  • TXN · Texas Instruments Inc5.9%
  • UNH · UnitedHealth Group Inc5.1%
  • KO · Coca-Cola Co4%
  • MRK · Merck & Co Inc3.9%

Sector breakdown: VIG vs SCHD

SectorVIGSCHDOverlap
Technology26.2%19.4%19.4%
Financial Services20.6%9.1%9.1%
Consumer Staples10.1%18.5%10.1%
Health Care16.5%18.4%16.5%
Energy3.5%14.6%3.5%
Industrials11.8%7.4%7.4%
Consumer Discretionary4.7%6.7%4.7%
Communication Services0%6%0%
Materials3.5%0%0%
Utilities3.2%0%0%
Real Estate0%0%0%

How we calculate it

Holdings overlap sums min(weight in fund A, weight in fund B) across positions that appear in both funds' disclosed top-holdings lists — public data discloses only each fund's largest positions, so this number is a lower bound on true full-portfolio overlap. Sector overlap applies the same min() logic to the funds' complete sector allocations, which cover ~100% of each fund, making it the more complete signal of duplication.

What's different between VIG and SCHD?

The largest VIG positions missing from SCHD's disclosed top holdings are AVGO, AAPL, MSFT. In the other direction, SCHD's largest positions not in VIG's top list are QCOM, TXN, UNH. Disclosed lists cover 32.4% of VIG and 43.5% of SCHD; the sector table below compares the funds on complete data.

Re-run this comparison live

Fund holdings change over time. Open VIG vs SCHD in the interactive ETF overlap calculator for a fresh comparison — or swap in any other tickers.

Open in the calculator

All comparisons run on the free ETF overlap calculator.

Data & methodology disclaimer

This tool is for education, not investment advice. Holdings and sector data come from public market-data feeds, reflect each fund's most recently disclosed top positions, and can lag the fund's actual portfolio. Overlap computed from disclosed top holdings is a lower bound. Always verify against the fund provider's official holdings file before making decisions.

Track your real portfolio, not just two tickers

Connect your full holding list in the free planner: combined look-through exposure, net worth tracking, and your path to financial independence — no spreadsheet required.

Get Started Free

This calculator is part of a free all-in-one personal finance planner

Budget, net worth, portfolio and your FIRE plan — all in one free dashboard.