QQQ vs QQQM: ETF Overlap

Invesco QQQ Trust vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — shared top holdings, sector duplication, and what makes each fund different.

Data as of August 25, 2026

Overlap results: QQQ vs QQQM

Sector overlap
100%

How much of the two funds' sector allocations coincide — computed on full sector data, so this is the headline number.

Top-holdings overlap
46.3%

Weight the funds' disclosed top holdings have in common. Public data discloses only each fund's largest positions (46.3% of QQQ, 46.3% of QQQM), so full-portfolio overlap is at least this much.

Shared top holdings
10

10 positions appear in both funds' disclosed top-holdings lists.

What does this overlap mean?

100% sector overlap is very high. These funds are close substitutes — owning both mostly duplicates one exposure instead of diversifying it. That isn't automatically wrong (fees, share classes or account types can justify holding both), but don't count them as two different bets.

Shared top holdings

TickerCompanyWeight in QQQWeight in QQQMOverlap
NVDANVIDIA Corp8%8%8%
AAPLApple Inc7.5%7.5%7.5%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.7%5.7%5.7%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.8%4.8%4.8%
MUMicron Technology Inc4.2%4.2%4.2%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.5%3.5%3.5%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A3.4%3.4%3.4%
GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C3.2%3.2%3.2%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.1%3.1%3.1%
METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A2.7%2.7%2.7%

Top QQQ holdings not in QQQM

Every disclosed top holding of QQQ also appears in QQQM.

Top QQQM holdings not in QQQ

Every disclosed top holding of QQQM also appears in QQQ.

Sector breakdown: QQQ vs QQQM

SectorQQQQQQMOverlap
Technology58%58%58%
Communication Services13.6%13.6%13.6%
Consumer Discretionary11.2%11.2%11.2%
Consumer Staples6.7%6.7%6.7%
Industrials3.9%3.9%3.9%
Health Care3.8%3.8%3.8%
Utilities1.2%1.2%1.2%
Materials1%1%1%
Energy0.5%0.5%0.5%
Financial Services0.2%0.2%0.2%
Real Estate0%0%0%

How we calculate it

Holdings overlap sums min(weight in fund A, weight in fund B) across positions that appear in both funds' disclosed top-holdings lists — public data discloses only each fund's largest positions, so this number is a lower bound on true full-portfolio overlap. Sector overlap applies the same min() logic to the funds' complete sector allocations, which cover ~100% of each fund, making it the more complete signal of duplication.

What's different between QQQ and QQQM?

The two funds' disclosed top holdings are identical — the practical differences are fees, share class, liquidity and tracking, not what they hold.

Re-run this comparison live

Fund holdings change over time. Open QQQ vs QQQM in the interactive ETF overlap calculator for a fresh comparison — or swap in any other tickers.

Open in the calculator

All comparisons run on the free ETF overlap calculator.

Data & methodology disclaimer

This tool is for education, not investment advice. Holdings and sector data come from public market-data feeds, reflect each fund's most recently disclosed top positions, and can lag the fund's actual portfolio. Overlap computed from disclosed top holdings is a lower bound. Always verify against the fund provider's official holdings file before making decisions.

Track your real portfolio, not just two tickers

Connect your full holding list in the planner: combined look-through exposure, net worth tracking, and your path to financial independence — no spreadsheet required.

Get Started

This calculator is part of an all-in-one personal finance planner

Budget, net worth, portfolio and your FIRE plan — all in one dashboard.